Standing Up

I would never want to be a policeman. From my viewpoint, it is a dangerous job for which they are terribly underpaid. More often than not, they deal with the dregs of society, and their view of the world is colored by seeing nothing but the dark underbelly of a particular jurisdiction. A simple traffic stop can suddenly turn deadly, and the stress of the job must be incredible. My friend and college roommate, Bruce, was Chief of Police in our hometown of Burbank, Illinois for years. I always remember him telling me about his “ride-along” with the police during his internship. He said they were called to check out a domestic disturbance, and he was told to grab a flashlight before they went to the door of the house. This was one of those long, metal flashlights with a line of heavy, “D” batteries in the handle. As Bruce hefted the weighty item in his hand, he asked what he was supposed to do with it. He was told something like, “It’s not for reading maps, kid. If this goes bad, it can be a weapon.” This story illustrates how even a seemingly innocuous situation can be fraught with danger. On top of the obvious hazards of the job, police often find themselves in situations for which they are ill-prepared. In particular, they are put on the front-lines in dealing with psychotic or mentally ill people. Most of the intelligent calls for police reform do not call for actual “defunding” or the abolition of police forces, but for dividing responsibilities so that fully trained persons are able to deal with specific situations. I say all of this as a reminder of what a difficult occupation being a police officer can be.

Still, the situation that erupted in the US over the past few weeks points out that something has to change. In 1964, segregation and racial discrimination legally ended with the passage of the Civil Rights Act. A year later, voting restrictions based on race officially came to an end. Yet these problems are still very much with us today. The truth is, it is much easier to pass legislation than it is to change the hearts and minds of people; the government cannot create economic opportunities, open doors to equal education, or end systemic racism with a stroke of the pen. These issues are much more complicated, and we are still wrestling with them almost sixty years after those landmark laws were passed.

No one is born thinking they are better or worse than those of another skin color. Racism is an attitude that is taught by parents, friends, authority figures, and a particular society. I was raised in a racist household that, in both subtle and overt ways, taught me that black people were to be feared and distrusted. I remember my dad putting a Confederate-flag sticker on our front door, even though he had never been south of 127th Street. Our neighborhood of Mt. Greenwood was tucked into the southwest corner of Chicago. My neighbors were predominantly policemen, firemen, and other city workers who had to live within the city limits to keep their jobs. Mt. Greenwood was as far from the inner city as you could get while still officially living in Chicago. It was also a bastion of segregation, with a buffer zone of railroad tracks and cemeteries protecting its denizens from the encroachment of African Americans. In a neighborhood of Irish-Catholics of modest economic means, my family of Scottish-Catholics was the closest thing we had to a minority. That was my world growing up, and I never crossed paths with people of any color other than white. Until I was thirteen.

I went to a pretty good grammar school (K-through-8) of 1500 white students. That school fed into a good high school called Morgan Park. In 1967, the Board of Education in Chicago announced that they would integrate my school with eight black students so that those kids could get the opportunity to attend a better HS, and, hopefully, increase their chances of getting into college. On the first day of classes, my school was surrounded by 3,000 angry white people, reporters, and other interested onlookers. I watched as a station wagon dropped off those eight terrified kids, who then had to walk from the curb to the front door, a 100-foot gauntlet of people screaming, spitting, and calling them the worst names you can imagine. I recognized many of my friends, neighbors, and role models in that fuming mob. (See picture above)

Within a few days, though, things calmed down, and the school year settled into a familiar routine. Thanks to the institutional regimentation of the Chicago Public School System, I got to know one of the new students. Omar Hester and John Henderson were next to each other alphabetically, therefore, we were assigned neighboring seats in every class. With my upbringing, I’m sure I was leery and standoffish toward this new boy, but the artificial cultural barriers between us soon dissolved. I learned that he was smarter than I was, he worked harder, and he was funnier than me. I also admired his determination to withstand prejudice and verbal abuse in order to fight for what he believed was his right to a good education. It wasn’t as if we became close friends, and we never hung out together outside of school, but he taught me that I had nothing to fear and much to learn from people who were different than me. The summer after that school year, we moved a couple of miles away to Burbank, and I never saw Omar again. Even at that time, though, I often thought about how unfair it was that I should receive better opportunities for education and for life simply because I lived on one side of the cemetery and had white skin, while someone else on the other side with dark skin did not have those same chances. That year changed me in important ways, and college, my study of history, and especially having black teammates on the track team, made those changes permanent.

In the past twenty years, talking to my African-American next-door neighbor in Nashville, I became more aware of the fear of being pulled over for “Driving While Black.” I, of course, never had to endure that particular humiliation, but I once had a similar experience. In the 1980s, I got a gig singing at a North-Side club near Wrigley Field. It was a gay bar that welcomed people of all sexual preferences. I left the place at about 2:00 am, and, as I was walking the few blocks to my car, I noticed that I was being slowly trailed by a police car. When I reached my beat-up vehicle, the police turned on their flashers and got out of their squad. They made me open my guitar case and looked through it, apparently searching for drugs. They examined my license and asked what I was doing in that neighborhood, so far from my home, at that hour. They looked in my car with flashlights. They let me go eventually, but followed me for several blocks until I pulled onto Lake Shore Drive. I’m sure that if I had so much as a broken tail-light, they would have ticketed me or worse. As I drove home, I was shaking my head, trying to figure out what had just happened, when it hit me: they assumed, that since I was coming out of a gay bar, I must be homosexual. I had been harassed for being gay. I laughed at the time, because nothing bad happened, and it made for a good story. Later, though, I was struck by the unfairness of being judged by an officer’s false assumption. I can’t imagine what it’s like to live with that unfairness every day as black people do.

After my last blog entry, my friend Barbara commented that she and her daughter (both white), attended a Black Lives Matter protest in their small, conservative town in Illinois wearing shirts that read, “I am listening.” The next day, some of her friends politely questioned her about her participation in what they probably viewed as an almost subversive activity. That story reminded me of an anecdote from the 1840s. Transcendentalist author Henry David Thoreau was in jail, having been arrested for refusing to pay taxes levied to finance the Mexican-American War. Thoreau—correctly—believed that the war was being waged to take land from Mexico in order to add new slave states to the Union and thus expand slavery. He declined to support such an endeavor and broke the law as a protest. His friend Ralph Waldo Emerson came to see him in jail, asking, with amusement in his voice, “Henry, what are you doing in here?” to which Thoreau replied, “I think the real question is ‘What are you doing out there?’” This situation is not a “Black Thing” or a “White Thing.” It is “Our Thing.”

That Thoreau story makes me feel a bit guilty for not doing more, but Kathleen and I are not the activist, protesting sorts. The Covid pandemic has also stifled any impulse we may have had to join marches in recent days. It may be a character flaw, but I have always preferred a quiet form of protest, relying on words and stories to change opinions. This has been my modus operandi while on stage as a folk-singer, in my classroom, or now, in this blog. Still, I have always admired the courage and determination of American protesters throughout history. Whether the cause was Black Lives Matter, an end to the Vietnam War, the Civil Rights Movement, unionizing workers in the 1930s, the right to vote for women, or the anti-slavery battles of the early 1800s, those people who fought and died for freedom in the streets of our nation were genuine heroes. They deserve our respect every bit as much as those who fought overseas in our wars.

In fact, one of the first protests in our history occurred in Boston, Massachusetts and helped spark the Revolutionary War. Tensions had been building in that city for months as the British soldiers increased in numbers and occupied the city with occasional brutal repression. Protests against that oppression and what were regarded as unfair taxes grew angrier. In March, 1770, fighting between people in the streets and the soldiers erupted and led to the British firing into the crowd, wounding six and killing five people. Many historians point to that event as the true start of the Revolution, which eventually gave us our freedom and started our democratic-republic.

Protests have been a crucial part of our nation since its inception. We are a great nation today, in large part, because of those people who were brave enough to stand up for their rights. It is also important to remember that the first man killed that March day in Boston and, thus, in the Revolution, was an African-American man named Crispus Attucks.

Divisions

Recently, much has been said and written about the divisions that we have in our country today. This led me to ponder the various dividing points that separate the 15,000 people who live here in our new home of River Falls.

Ironically, a street named Division is a major axis in River Falls. Main Street parallels the Kinnickinnic River and forms the primary artery on a north-to-south line. The east-west running street of Division, however, doesn’t bisect the town evenly into rectangular-grid quadrants, as the name might indicate. Instead, it is on the north edge of town, separating one of the newer sections from the older  section. It gets its name, I would guess from the fact that it forms the border between Pierce County and St. Croix County. That’s right: people on one side of Division Street in River Falls live in one county, while those on the other side reside in a different one. St. Croix County hugs the river that gives it its name and straddles I-94 before it crosses over into the Twin Cities. We live in Pierce County, which is predominantly rural and contains about half as many people as its northern neighbor. It also borders the St. Croix River, but, with no major bridge crossing into Minnesota, it has less traffic and a slower pace of life. Aside from the fact that certain government services are centered in one county or the other, this county division is insignificant and appears only on maps. In fact, I have never even seen a sign saying that you are leaving one county or entering the next.

As in most places, sports rivalries play a big role up here. Growing up in Chicago, I know that the Cubs-White Sox rift is the most pronounced division in terms of sports in that town. While loyalty to the Bears, Blackhawks, or Bulls tends to unify Chicagoans, most would agree that, if you have any integrity at all, you can only support one of the two major-league baseball teams. River Falls is only about 25-30 miles from Minneapolis-St. Paul, but, in terms of sports loyalties, it seems to be more a part of Wisconsin than Minnesota. Packers’ fans appear to outnumber Vikings fans by a significant measure, and Wisconsin Badger supporters are more numerous than those of the Minnesota Gophers. However, in baseball, my purely unscientific and impressionistic estimate gives the nod to the Twins over Milwaukee’s Brewers.

There are other divisions that are unique to this town. For instance, living in a cold climate such as this, people take their windows seriously. Fights can break out between those who favor Pella windows over those who swear by windows made by Anderson. A local political controversy revolved around the two dams on the Kinnickinnic River. Some thought they should be should be destroyed and the falls should be restored to their natural state, while others argued that the dams, built in 1904, should remain in place. Just last year, it was decided that the dams will come down in stages over the next few years, but “Free the Kinni” signs can still be seen in windows around town.

More familiar political divisions are, of course, present in River Falls as well. Wisconsin, with its ten electoral votes is definitely one of the battleground states this year, having voted Republican in 2016 by only .77 of one percent. River Falls seems to be in a “purple” region of the state, being evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats.  The presence of a university in town means that many people are college-educated and lean toward moderate and progressive candidates. The area around the town, though, is rural and more conservative. As a result, a large number of people support Donald Trump, while a similar number of people tend to support democracy, equality, and the Constitution instead. For our part, Kathleen and I are delighted to finally live in a state in which our vote will mean something. For years, it was depressing watching Tennessee elections called on TV about twenty seconds after the polls closed.

The rigid political divisions that plague our nation today can be traced to three developments a few decades ago. In 1988, Rush Limbaugh began his syndicated talk-radio program that is still on the air. From the beginning, his programs were marked by vitriol, racism, and fear- mongering. He also created the myth that he alone told the truth about politics, and that no other news sources could be trusted. He gained a huge audience among conservatives who wanted to believe that anyone who differed from their viewpoint was part of a left-wing conspiracy or bias. Then, in 1994, as part of his “Contract with America,” newly elected Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich issued a memo to all Republican senators and representatives. The memo indicated that any person who crossed the aisle and voted for Democratic-sponsored bills would essentially be ostracized from the Republican Party and cut off from all party support. Within the next decade, Democratic congressmen responded with similar partisan tactics, and gridlock has resulted. Recent studies on the political logjam in Congress have all pointed to Gingrich’s time as Speaker as a key factor in creating the obstructionist politics and polarization that are such a problem today. Finally, in 1996, Fox News Channel began their one-sided broadcasts. The powerful network routinely ignores facts in order to put a right-wing spin on all events and has evolved into much more a source of opinions than an actual news channel. Today, there are half-a-dozen legitimate news sources available on television, and yet millions of people get a twisted, disingenuous, and misleading form of the news from Fox. In terms of division, these three events have had an impact on this country that have altered Fox’s slogan of “We report, you decide,” to a more accurate “We distort, you divide.”

Then, this week, former Secretary of Defense, retired Marine General James Mattis, a man who has spent his entire professional career staying apolitical and above the fray, issued a statement that urged Americans to unite without expecting leadership to come from the Oval Office. He wrote, “Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership.” These powerful words from a highly respected figure have been echoed in ensuing days by other military leaders, disillusioned Republicans, and former presidents from both parties. Even the intellectual voice of Conservatism for the past several decades, George Will, expressed his hope that the GOP will lose the coming election in order to awaken the party from the Trump-induced stupor into which it has fallen. His harshest words were reserved for the Republicans in the Senate who abandoned all sense of responsibility to the Constitution in their “Vichyite collaboration” with “this low-rent Lear raging on his Twitter-heath.” I usually disagree with much of what Will has to say, but the man can certainly write, and he always makes me think and question my assumptions.

I will wrap up this entry by pointing out that, in River Falls, the east-west road next to and parallel to Division is called Union Street. I sincerely hope that we as a nation can manage to traverse that half-block and find our way from Division to Union in the near future.